Thursday, March 26, 2009

Three SABEW awards


It's been a very difficult week at work, but on Tuesday morning I got some news that really made my day: The Industry Standard received three awards from the Society of American Business Editors and Writers.

SABEW was founded in the 1960s and is headquartered at the University of Missouri's journalism school. Its members consist of thousands of business journalists, mostly from the U.S.. The annual "Best in Business" contest is judged by a SABEW committee, and highlights some of the outstanding business journalism each year. Traditionally, the awards have concentrated on print publications (daily newspapers and business magazines) but in recent years online publishers have made inroads, and there is now an "online excellence" component to the BiB contest.

For the 2008 contest, the Standard was recognized in three online categories for small websites: Where Are They Now? (Project) "10 'Net services that will succeed (and 10 that will probably fail)" (Creative Use of Online) and four of my own blog posts on The Standard (Blog):
  • Microsoft's unrealized online dreams (February 3, 2008)
  • What's missing from the Twitter funding announcement: Revenue (June 24, 2008)
  • Why podcasting is failing, part II: Lessons from PodTech (July 18, 2008)
  • Randy Pausch dies, and the world loses a true hero (July 25, 2008)
Here's what the judge said about my work:
“The Twitter post was spot-on. Then the follow-up on Twitter and podcasting advanced the issue further and was a longer piece, but still interesting. His voice could be stronger. Still, he is a fine writer who keeps his readers’ interest.
It's a nice comment, and the advice is welcome: I do need to improve my voice. That's something I'll try to work on in the coming months.

In addition, while we may be small, these awards demonstrate that the TIS staff and contributors can really do some special work. A lot of credit needs to go to the many folks who wrote and produced the two special features that won the Project and Creative Use of Online awards, including contributing writers Bill Snyder, Kristen Nicole, David Cotriss, and Mark Henricks, as well as the Standard's Eric Hill, Chris Tompkins, and Baldwin Louie. This was a great honor for all of us and you can see by looking at the complete list of Best in Business winners that we're in very good company.

Monday, March 16, 2009

More lego models ...

A few weeks back, I wrote about my son and I modeling objects using legos. Now the girl is getting into it, too. A few of our latest creations:

Lego people -- totally my daughter's idea:

lego people

My son made a stairway/table for his mini plastic racoon:



A ship, which I made using longer lego crossbeams and plastic planking:



A mutant dinosaur that I created (I didn't like it, but my son did):



I'm pretty encouraged by how well both kids are taking to coming up with ideas and modeling them in plastic. The girl is already an experienced Webkinz user; maybe it's time for her to start modeling using 3D graphics tools? What should I start her on -- Sketchup, or something else?

Sunday, March 15, 2009

I'm on the BBC ... in Vietnamese!

Late last year, I was approached by the BBC World Service for an unusual project. The 30th anniversary of China's invasion of Vietnam was to take place at the beginning of 2009, and they wanted some commentary about the events -- for their Vietnamese-language service. A producer happened upon my grad school blog and emailed me after seeing that my thesis research covered bilateral relations between China and Vietnam in the late 1970s.

Last week, the translation of my essay was published on the BBC's website. You can read it on the BBC website, or see the screenshot:


Here's the preamble in English:
China’s state news agency provides a window into its Vietnam policies from 1979 to 1989

Many factors contributed to the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese conflict and the decade-long period of poor relations that followed. One way to analyze the relative importance of these factors from China’s point of view is to examine the media coverage from the English-language service of China’s state-run Xinhua News Agency. It is commonly believed that Beijing’s overriding goal was to outflank Moscow’s growing influence in Indochina. However, a computer content analysis of Xinhua articles during this period indicates that China was increasingly preoccupied with Vietnam’s regional ambitions, especially after 1980.

What makes China’s news agency such a useful window into the thoughts of Chinese leaders? It’s not just the access Xinhua employees had to senior officials. The news agency’s English-language service actually served as the official conduit of policy-related information from the central government to the outside world. During the 1970s and 1980s, Xinhua reported to the Chinese Communist Party Department of Propaganda, which gave it a direct connection to Beijing’s leading nucleus. The English-language articles never contradicted the official line, and are recognized as a reliable authority on how China viewed key foreign relationships – including the contentious relationship with Vietnam.

Beyond examining individual articles or pronouncements for clues into China’s attitudes toward Vietnam, it is also possible to analyze the articles in aggregate to discern broad trends. Computer software can measure the volume of coverage about specific topics as well as the positive and negative tone assigned to those topics. Clear patterns are apparent in the data, and they give very interesting insights into the thinking of China’s top leaders.
I am not going to post the entire English version of the essay here, but if you're interested in learning more about this topic, I recommend checking out my thesis here.

I also traveled to Vietnam in 2011, and blogged about some of my experiences there:

A giant step for ALM thesis research

The search engine is the new card catalog at universities. And if you're completing or considering one of the graduate programs at the Harvard Extension School, I have some good news: The ALM office now has an arrangement with UMI/ProQuest to electronically archive completed theses, and make them available via ProQuest's widely used online service.

This is a big deal for graduate students and recent alumni. ALM theses are guided by Harvard faculty and take years to complete, but until now the printed findings have seldom reached beyond a very small population of students and faculty who have access to Harvard's Grossman Library. Placing the theses in an online, searchable database bypasses the limitations of physical libraries, and makes information available to a much larger scholarly community. Now, any student, professor or associate whose university library system has a UMI/ProQuest subscription can find the Harvard Extension School theses by browsing topic areas or searching for certain keywords. HES students can also have their theses published on PQDT Open, a service which places theses and dissertations on an open Web server for anyone to download for free.

Of course, there are many other options for sharing scholarly work online, using hosted Web services or publishing on Scribd. However, such online services have a significant trust issue, as I noted on Harvard Extended several years back:
Nearly two years ago, I petitioned the Extension School to archive masters theses in the same electronic database used for doctoral dissertations at Harvard, ProQuest UMI. While this is a closed database that can only be accessed through university library systems, it is restricted to vetted, accepted research from university masters and doctoral programs. It is widely used in academic circles -- in fact, the literature review in my thesis referenced several dissertations that I had located in the ProQuest UMI database. I hope that someday my own thesis might also be useful to future scholars of modern Chinese history, Cold War history, and Chinese media studies, if Harvard decides to extend this resource to ALM theses from the Extension School.
Other academic units at Harvard already used the service for dissertations, and the ALM office saw the value in extending it to the Extension School as well. I really believe it greatly increases the likelihood that HES graduate research reaches a much wider scholarly audience and contributes to the understanding of the world around us.

My own thesis ("Making a case for quantitative research in the study of modern Chinese history: The New China News Agency and Chinese policy views of Vietnam, 1977--1993") was actually the guinea pig for the ProQuest arrangement. I've been nagging the school for some time about this, and the ALM office unexpectedly approached me last year to let me know about the electronic archiving option and also to ask if I was interested in trying out the ProQuest interface to upload my thesis. I experienced a couple of hiccups owing to a minor problem with the thesis PDF, but eventually I successfully uploaded my thesis and had it approved by the ALM office.

Note that there was a fee attached to UMI/ProQuest's service. In my case, I had to pay the most expensive rate -- around $150 -- because I chose the "open" publishing option, which places the abstract and thesis PDF on an open Web server, where anyone can download it (otherwise, it can only be seen by subscribers to the ProQuest service, such as university library systems). This extra charge for making information free and the long delay in publishing the thesis online (it took about four months) are my only complaints about the service.

If you're interested in reading my thesis abstract and downloading the PDF, it's available here. If you are an Extension School student or recent alumnus and want to find out more about the electronic archiving option, contact the ALM office.

Monday, March 02, 2009

Follow-up: My online education experience

(Note: Since writing the post below, I have taken a for-credit online math course. My review of the online math class can be read here.) Last September, I signed up for Michael Sandel's online "Justice" class through the Harvard Alumni Association. I was not as interested in the topic as much as I was interested in sampling Internet-based learning, which was the subject of a post on my graduate school blog last autumn ("Distance education at Harvard: I'm not convinced") and a response from a friend who is getting his undergraduate degree through the Harvard Extension School's distance education offerings (see ClueHQ, "Is Distance Education a Problem at Harvard?").

I should note right off the bat that Sandel's online class is not currently part of the Extension School's online offerings, although it was at one point in the past. I did not sit through all of the sessions, nor did I complete any of the assignments that the in-class students had to deal with. Nevertheless, after taking part in Justice, I am able to offer a basic evaluation of Web-based distance education based on prerecorded video and asynchronous communications tools, the same format used for most of the Extension School's online classes.

I found that many of the concerns that I raised last year about online education were validated. While the video of Sandel's prerecorded Harvard College lectures were wonderful to watch on a lazy Sunday morning, I felt very isolated by the experience of having to sit on my hands while he fielded questions from the in-person group and debated various philosophical and legal concepts with them. The class blog set up for alumni had some interesting discussions that popped up after the videos were aired, and Sandel had "online office hours" to discuss the class with participants (apparently following the format his class used when it was offered through the Extension School), but it just wasn't the same. The quick give-and-take and the ability to steer a classroom debate in a different direction with a spontaneous question or example was entirely absent, as was the experience of turning to the person sitting next to you to talk about the class. And while it was nice to be able to stop the video to take a break, or replay certain sections, I also found that it was very easy to be distracted by IM, the phone, and other browser sessions.

Harvard seems to be aware of the limitations of this type of distance learning, and indeed only the Extension School has embraced asynchronous online learning as a substitute for in-class instruction for credit at the university. It's worth noting that one of the few other entities on campus that actively experiments with online education -- the Berkman Center for Internet and Society -- has concentrated on real-time class sessions using Web technologies and virtual worlds like Second Life.

Of course, these technologies have their own drawbacks -- they may require extra staff and a steep learning curve to effectively employ. Nevertheless, they at least allow the spontaneous group discussions and other forms of conversational learning that I believe are still central to a modern university education.

Update: More than one student has described to me the difficulties inherent in online communications with instructors and TAs.

I heard from one HES student who took a Java programming class that was offered as a distance ed class in the ALM in IT program. He said that there was nearly "0%" interaction with the instructor and distance TA, zero feedback on assignments, and all of the assignments were recycled from the previous semester. Another student complained to me that he was unable to get in contact with a TA to discuss an important assignment, and a third, posting on the Extension Student online forum, complained that the "TAs who are running the show appear to be very weak at communications."

Online communications breakdown shouldn't come as a surprise. On the Internet, students are usually associated by their email and discussion board interactions. For in-person classes, teachers get to know students' faces, voices, and willingness to take part in class discussions. Instructors for many courses encourage students to raise their hands to ask questions during class sessions, and it is usually possible to talk with a teacher or TA before or after class, or during office hours. Students can't be ignored in such a setting. Online, however, it is very easy for instructors to overlook electronic communications, which can lead to a great deal of frustration for students. For distance students at the Extension School, there are no required "office hours" in which students can call or reach out to instructors.

Disclosure: I am a board member of the nonprofit Immersive Education initiative, which seeks to develop best practices and standards for education in virtual worlds.